Freedom of Speech
WARNING: rant ahead
( Read more... )
The libel laws in this country are a joke. They so heavily favour the claimants in cases that they are threatening freedom of expression of writers, journalists, comedians, scientists and more.
In science especially ( I specifically mention science here as that is the area I am most familiar with), freedom to criticise and question ideas is of the utmost importance -anyone can make mistakes and the freedom to query claims made is what stimulates debate and keeps the system fair. With the way the libel laws stand at the moment however, it is all to easy for a scientist with legitimate questions to ask to be intimidated into not doing so for the fear of a long and costly libel case in which it is all too likely that the British courts will rule against them.
The British Chiropractic Association, BCA, sued Simon Singh for libel concerning an article he wrote for the Guardian in April 2008 basing the case on a meaning of phrase that was not intended. This is the case that has since sparked the Libel Reform Campaign in the UK. The campaign aims to get the libel laws in this country amended to enable freedom of expression and healthy debate, meaning that writers and scientists no longer have to self-censor, ensuring that we, the public, are able to read about the issues rather than them being hidden from us for fear of career-damaging lawsuits.
Please take a look at the website and sign the petition for libel reform in the UK. Here, you can read the views of others supporting the campaign and see examples of cases which show the necessity for change.
I believe this is a worthy topic, deserving of public support, if you feel the same please spread the news to others.
( Read more... )
The libel laws in this country are a joke. They so heavily favour the claimants in cases that they are threatening freedom of expression of writers, journalists, comedians, scientists and more.
In science especially ( I specifically mention science here as that is the area I am most familiar with), freedom to criticise and question ideas is of the utmost importance -anyone can make mistakes and the freedom to query claims made is what stimulates debate and keeps the system fair. With the way the libel laws stand at the moment however, it is all to easy for a scientist with legitimate questions to ask to be intimidated into not doing so for the fear of a long and costly libel case in which it is all too likely that the British courts will rule against them.
The British Chiropractic Association, BCA, sued Simon Singh for libel concerning an article he wrote for the Guardian in April 2008 basing the case on a meaning of phrase that was not intended. This is the case that has since sparked the Libel Reform Campaign in the UK. The campaign aims to get the libel laws in this country amended to enable freedom of expression and healthy debate, meaning that writers and scientists no longer have to self-censor, ensuring that we, the public, are able to read about the issues rather than them being hidden from us for fear of career-damaging lawsuits.
Please take a look at the website and sign the petition for libel reform in the UK. Here, you can read the views of others supporting the campaign and see examples of cases which show the necessity for change.
I believe this is a worthy topic, deserving of public support, if you feel the same please spread the news to others.
discontent
tired
annoyed
lethargic
amused